Understanding Reservation System in India

Today is 129th birth anniversary of Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, a towering personality in Indian freedom movement and framer of the Indian Constitution. His emancipatory work for Schedule Cast (SC) and other marginalised section of Indian society makes him a revered figure among them. However, it will be a gross injustice to him if we only restrict Ambedkar as a leader of that specific section of population. He was a true genius, a great political scientist, a remarkable economist, a jurist, a polyglot and, above all, ray of hope of millions of those who were thrown into darkness of slavery, untouchability and pauperisation since generations. Awarded Bharat Ratna only in 1993, he is one of those personalities whose stature have grown by time. A lot many articles must have published today in different platforms regarding his life and work, I will restrict myself to one of the outcomes of his political struggle, which is highly contentious as well, i.e. “Reservation”. Wherever the discussion regarding reservation takes place, my common experience is that it has a tendency to get divided in to two sections. One those who support and other those who oppose it. However, my purpose in this article is very simple. I would try to explain how the judicial interpretations, judgments and government actions have evolved over the period of time regarding this policy of reservation.

Our constitution rests of the principle of balance between Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Supremacy. This simply means that Indian Parliament has right to frame legislation which it deems necessary, however, these legislations are consistent with the Indian Constitution will be decided by the Supreme Court. Indian constitution give the fundamental right to each citizens. One among them is “Right to Equality”. Which means, in simple language, every person will be same in the eyes of the law and there will be no discrimination based on caste, gender, religion, race and place of birth. However the policy of reservation apparently seems to be discriminating. People from specific communities or categories are given reservation in educational institutions, government jobs and in political representation. These measures were taken to uplift the socially, educationally (and recently economically) section of society. The whole purpose, as per the proponent of reservation is to bring more equity in the society.

To understand that equality is not always desirable and concept of equity is more justifiable, we can look to the following representation

Credit: Interaction Institute for Social Change | Artist: Angus Maguire

Here we can see, in first half, everyone stands on the same plank of same height which represents the equality. However, in second part of the image, the one with shorter height is given more favour so he can also enjoy the game equally, which was not possible in earlier case. This positive discrimination is called equity. Reservation, as per those who advocates the policy, serves the same purpose. However those who opposes this policy, as per them, it’s just the gross injustice inflicted upon the meritocracy. They say that even if the caste system were prevalent in past and out of that many disabilities were imposed on so called lower caste, still why to punish the current generation for the act which they haven’t done.


Originally, reservations were given to the people from SC/ST community. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes comprise about 16.6% and 8.6%, respectively, of India’s population (according to the 2011 census). If we look at the reservation figure for these two communities, it stands in proportion to their population. People from Schedule Caste gets 15% and from Schedule Tribe gets 7.5% reservation.

In 1979, Morarji Desai government, invoked the article 340 of the Indian Constitution and formed Second Backward Class Commission under the Chairmanship of B.P Mandal to investigate the conditions of the socially and educationally backward classes and to suggest measures for their progress. After nearly one year the commission submitted its report and identified 3743 social groups which were educationally and socially backward. For their advancement, the commission suggested that they should be given 27% reservation in Government Jobs (not in educational institutions). However, one should keep in mind that 27% in not an arbitrary number but a constitutional necessity. The reason being that in 1963 Supreme Court of India has given a judgment in which governments were barred to give reservation more than 50% in government jobs in a year. Since SC and ST reservation (15%+7.5%=22.5%) accounts for approx. 23% hence 27% OBC reservation will save the possibility of judicial scrutiny. However, the Janta Government collapsed and the commission report was not implemented immediately. It was implemented 10 years later by V.P. Singh government, and they awarded 27% reservation to Other Backward Class (OBC) community in government jobs. In 1991, P.V. Narsimha Rao government made few changes and added two more provisions: First, creamy layers among OBC will not get benefit of reservation and Second, he also proposed 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections of the so called upper caste.

When this policy of the government for giving reservation to OBC came, there were fierce opposition to this. Many litigations were filled in the Supreme Court and finally SC gave a landmark judgement in the Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, (1992) which is also Known as Mandal Case.

The important outcomes of the judgement

*Creamy Layers among OBC should not enjoy the Benefits of Reservation

*SC rejected the 10% quota given to Economically Weaker Section among General Category

*Reservation should not exceed 50% in a year

*There should be reservation only at entry level and not in Promotions

*Carry forward rule should be there but it should not exceed 50%

However government took several steps to nullify the Supreme Court order. Through 77th Constitutional Amendment in 1995, government enabled reservation in promotion as well for SC and ST community. By the 81st Amendment Act of 2000, ruling with regard to backlog vacancies was nullified. By 85th Amendment Act of 2001 the government allowed ‘consequential seniority’. But no steps were taken in regards the nullification of reservation given to General Category. Very recently in 2019 through 103rd Amendment Act government gave 10% reservation to EWS category from General Category.

I tried to present, in brief, the history of reservation in India. Initially our framer of the constitution allowed reservation in political representation for only 10 years but subsequent amendments of the constitution it is still in continuation. Hope this brief write up will help you to give some insight.

Do let me know your views on Reservation System in India. #StaySafe


26 thoughts on “Understanding Reservation System in India”

  1. आरक्षण जिसे संविधान निर्माता अम्बेडकर जी ने लागू किया था वह कहीं से नाजायज नही था। मगर बाद में संसोधित आरक्षण राजनीत से प्रेरित है जिसका मैं पक्षधर नही।
    मैं अकेला जन्मा अकेला मर जाऊँगा,
    मेरा अधिकार मेरा कर्तव्य सब अकेला है,
    हमें जाति धर्म से जोड़कर एक तरह से संविधान का उल्लंघन ही है।यहाँ नागरिक समानता अधिकार कहाँ है?
    मैं निर्धन हूँ,योग्य भी मगर प्रताड़ित हूँ अम्बेडकर जी से भी ज्यादा।

    Liked by 4 people

    1. जी बिल्कुल! पता नहीं अम्बेडकर जी रहते तो आज उनका आरक्षण को लेकर क्या मत रहता!

      Liked by 4 people

  2. Nicely crafted…I’ve seen some SC people get the stipend from government and spend it as pocket money. I’ve also seen a deserving OC candidate drop out of college because the fees was too much for her to pay. So many ST seats go unfilled because they were not enabled to reach for the seats in the primary level. Thanks for the write up! loved reading it.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hey NJ, Thanks for reading and giving your views. As I told, the debate on reservation is deeply divided. Those who get it, they feel that it is their right as they were subjugated and prejudiced since generations. Since it is a politically charged topic, hence no party is willing to touch it, rather we have seen a new criteria of EWS came last year. I don’t see reservation going out from India any time soon!
      Hope you have enjoyed reading the content.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Wonderful post and well composed.
    When Dr Ambedkar had crafted things under reservation section things were different and was in demand with the prevailing circumstances but later and now it have become a political stunt. Progress of our nation definitely requires to abolish the reservation section completely. Hampering the overall growth of our country. That’s my opinion.


  4. It’s interesting to compare your quota system to America’s. The great loophole to achieving social equity in my country would be the private job sector. How about yours?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The context and historical background of your country and ours is completely different. In our case reservation is considered as an affirmative action to uplift those who were at disadvantages position. Previously we chose mixed economy where public and private sector co-exist. But it was heavily inclined towards public sector., just as a a socialist state. But we also opened up our economy in in 1991 after that private sector become prominent. reservation is only for the public sector and not for the private sector. Hence I think in this we are same. Which category of people in your country gets quota?


      1. Our Affirmative Action system is heavily based on the fact that minority groups have not been given equal opportunity for jobs, housing. That would be African Americans traditionally.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes Sir..But in original constitution the criteria for reservation was socially and educationally backwardness, not the economics backwardness.
      However, las year Economic Weaker Section also started to get 10% reservation from general cast.


  5. I am one of those many unfortunate ppl who is being punished thru reservation for a crime i never committed.. I can honestly say that Reservation has single handedly made me my life difficult in India.. T rules r for evry1.. Equality for all.. Unity in diversity.. reservation is there to nullify all those phrases..

    Liked by 1 person

    1. But what about those who were discriminated and degraded for generations. It was there to make unequal equal. However, I understand your concern.


        1. Agree with you..I am also at the receiving end. But they have suffered for generations for none of their fault. This is the way we should atone.


          1. hi Abhay.. so 50 years from now.. we will be under privileged because of this.. and reservation will be given for us.. im just saying v hav to even the playfield.. not based on caste.. but based on other factors.. for example, the qualification of the parents.. if a parent of an SC or any reserved category student is working in a reputable job (Officers and higher).. Reservation is no longer needed for their children.. because the purpose of uplifting their family is achieved..if the parents are uneducated or under employed.. then the child deserves the reservation by all means.. thanks for your point of view…

            Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: